Operational LLM guide

This corpus supports evidence-grounded retrieval and drafting. It does not authorise a real information flow.

Route by question

• “What is the minimum or maximum?” → minimum-to-maximum requirement model
• “How do I decide a specific flow?” → sharing route decision workflow
• “Can care teams share this?” → direct-care sharing route
• “Can this be used for research, planning, audit or commissioning?” → beyond-care sharing route
• “Which NHS standard is mandatory?” → NHS standards applicability register
• “What safety/security evidence is needed?” → clinical safety and security controls
• “Which claim/source is authoritative?” → evidence matrix and source register
• “What may change?” → validation queue and horizon

Response contract

For a flow-specific answer:

1. state jurisdiction and research date;
2. distinguish current law, conditional standard, guidance, local decision and future proposal;
3. classify purpose, data, roles and recipient;
4. identify every required legal layer, not only a GDPR basis;
5. cite stable source-register links beside material claims;
6. state which facts remain unresolved and route them to the validation queue;
7. express “maximum” as purpose/role-specific safe interoperability, never maximum record volume;
8. recommend human specialist review proportional to novelty and risk.

Never treat generated Graphify, OKF, llms*, navigation or search output as evidence.