Beyond-care sharing route
Planning, commissioning, service management, audit, research, public health, population health and product development are not automatically covered by the direct-care route.
Order of preference
- Use genuinely anonymous information where it can achieve the purpose.
- If personal information is necessary, reduce identifiability and access while recognising that pseudonymised data remains personal data for parties able to re-identify.
- Identify the controller’s function and complete Article 6, Article 9 and DPA Schedule 1 analysis.
- For CPI, establish a separate confidentiality route: explicit consent, a specific legal requirement, section 251/COPI support, or a documented overriding-public-interest basis.
- For identifiable GP record data leaving the practice/system, apply the Type 1 opt-out; separately apply the national data opt-out where the use/disclosure is in scope and no current exemption applies.
- Screen for a DPIA and complete it before processing where likely high risk; otherwise document the screening result. Put agreements, transparency, security, retention and audit controls in place, and obtain specialist approval where the chosen route requires it.
Section 251 is not a blanket permission. It enables regulations supporting defined medical purposes where anonymised information is not practicable and approval conditions are met. SRC-008
The Type 1 opt-out operates at GP-system level for identifiable GP record data leaving for beyond-care purposes. The national data opt-out applies to many later uses and disclosures of CPI beyond individual care in England. Each is a patient choice mechanism, not a lawful basis. Properly anonymous data and some defined exceptions fall outside the national data opt-out; both results must be recorded rather than assumed. SRC-009 SRC-033
See research, planning and audit, opt-outs and section 251, and the sharing route decision workflow.